Guide to IPOs

Comprehensive guide to Initial Public Offerings, the process, pricing dynamics, and alternatives

Author: Luminth Team
Published: September 10, 2025
Last Updated: September 10, 2025

What an IPO is—and where the idea came from

An initial public offering (IPO) is the first time a company registers securities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and offers shares to public investors on a national exchange. In modern U.S. practice, IPOs are conducted under the Securities Act of 1933 via a registration statement (commonly Form S-1) and a prospectus provided to investors. The SEC frames an IPO as the first public sale of stock, emphasizing disclosure and investor protection rather than "approval" of the deal's merits.

Key IPO Characteristics

  • First registration with SEC and public exchange listing
  • Form S-1 registration statement and prospectus
  • Emphasis on disclosure over merit approval
  • Cyclical activity with varying first-day returns

Academic finance has studied IPOs for decades. A canonical synthesis by Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch (2002) reviews the history and evidence: IPO activity tends to be cyclical, first-day "pops" are common, and long-run performance varies across eras and industries.

Why companies go public

Firms go public for multiple reasons beyond "raising cash." A widely cited empirical study of Italian firms by Pagano, Panetta, and Zingales (1998) finds that companies often IPO after periods of heavy investment—using the public market to rebalance capital structure, lower the cost of debt, and allow partial cash-out by existing owners—more than to finance brand-new investment.

Primary Motivations for Going Public

Financial Benefits

  • Rebalance capital structure
  • Lower cost of debt
  • Access to capital markets
  • Partial cash-out for owners

Strategic Benefits

  • Enhanced brand visibility
  • Employee equity liquidity
  • Currency for acquisitions
  • Market valuation discovery

The SEC likewise notes that motivations extend beyond funding needs, citing Pagano et al. in its 2020 Report to Congress on offering exemptions.

Venture capital (VC) backing also shapes the "why." VC participation can certify quality to the market, lowering information asymmetry: the classic evidence (Megginson & Weiss, 1991) shows that VC-backed IPOs have lower initial returns and fees, consistent with a certification role.

How IPOs work: from filing to pricing

Registration and disclosure

The issuer files a registration statement (e.g., Form S-1) detailing the business, financials, risks, governance, and intended use of proceeds; the SEC reviews for disclosure adequacy. Examples like Robinhood's S-1 illustrate the structure: a preliminary "red herring" prospectus followed by a final prospectus once pricing and share counts are set.

Who benefits and how

Investors

For investors, IPOs create access to new growth opportunities with extensive mandated disclosure. The SEC's Investor Bulletin explains risks (e.g., volatility, limited operating history, potential aftermarket support) and due-diligence basics (read the prospectus, understand lockups).

VCs and Early Shareholders

VCs benefit from liquidity and valuation discovery. The certification effect (Megginson & Weiss, 1991) suggests that reputable VCs can reduce information frictions—potentially improving pricing and lowering gross spreads—while the IPO facilitates partial exits and fund distribution.

The Issuer (Company)

Beyond capital raising, going public can: (i) broaden investor base, (ii) reduce the cost of capital via liquid secondary trading, (iii) enhance brand visibility, and (iv) enable employee equity liquidity. Empirical work shows balance-sheet rebalancing and changes in governance/monitoring after the IPO (Pagano et al., 1998; Ritter & Welch, 2002).

The Exchange

Exchanges supply listing, trading, surveillance, and issuer-services. They also impose listing standards (market value, shareholders, price thresholds, financial metrics, governance). For example, Nasdaq's Initial Listing Guide (March 2, 2025) and the NYSE's summary of quantitative standards detail eligibility and the exchanges' discretion to deny listing to protect investors and the public interest.

What the process costs and why underwriter choice matters

Underwriters advise on timing, structure, valuation, marketing, and stabilization. Their reputation and methods affect outcomes (pricing, allocations, spreads). The bookbuilding literature (Benveniste & Spindt, 1989) and survey reviews (Ritter & Welch, 2002) emphasize that underwriter-investor relationships and information production are central to discovering price while managing incentives.

Key Underwriter Roles

  • Timing and structure advice
  • Valuation determination
  • Marketing to investors
  • Price stabilization
  • Information production
  • Investor relationship management

Aftermarket realities: performance and cycles

IPOs are cyclical. Hot markets often feature higher first-day returns and greater issuance. Over longer horizons, average post-IPO performance can disappoint relative to benchmarks, with strong variation across size, industry, and cycle (summarized in Ritter & Welch, 2002; and updated long-run return tables through 2023).

Alternatives to a traditional underwritten IPO

Reverse mergers ("backdoor listings")

In a reverse merger, a private operating company merges into a public shell to obtain public status without a traditional IPO. The SEC's Investor Bulletin notes that reverse mergers are often perceived as quicker and cheaper, but also come with risks (e.g., shell company liabilities, disclosure and governance concerns).

Academic work documents the mechanism and trade-offs: studies of reverse takeovers describe them as an alternative pathway with different investor-protection and informational environments than IPOs; outcomes and long-run returns can differ meaningfully from traditional IPOs. The SEC has also discussed rulemaking to address fraud and shell-company abuses historically associated with some backdoor listings.

Why a traditional IPO instead of staying private—or using alternatives?

Compared with staying private

IPOs can expand access to capital, enhance liquidity for early holders, strengthen governance via market monitoring, and reduce borrowing costs—outcomes consistent with Pagano et al. (1998) and SEC analyses of offering choices.

Compared with reverse mergers

Reverse mergers can be faster, but they may offer weaker price discovery and different investor-protection optics; the SEC warns of due-diligence pitfalls (e.g., undisclosed liabilities) in shells. Traditional IPOs, by contrast, involve deeper disclosure, marketing, and price discovery infrastructures (bookbuilding, syndicate distribution, stabilization), which can help align issuer and public-investor expectations.

Compared with SPACs

Peer-reviewed evidence implies higher total costs for operating companies going public via SPACs than via traditional IPOs; firms may still prefer SPACs for deal-specific reasons (e.g., negotiation flexibility).

Where the company lists: listing standards and current rule shifts

Exchanges determine eligibility. Nasdaq's 2025 Initial Listing Guide and NYSE's standards summary outline quantitative criteria (e.g., shareholder counts, public float, market value, price tests) and governance requirements. Exchanges retain broad discretion to deny listings to protect investors and the public interest.

Common Listing Requirements

  • Minimum shareholder counts and public float
  • Market value thresholds
  • Price and financial tests
  • Corporate governance requirements

Listing standards evolve. For example, in 2025 Nasdaq gained SEC approval for new liquidity benchmarks for certain listings (effective April 11, 2025), part of an ongoing tightening cycle around thinly traded or higher-risk listings.

Summing up: what IPOs "do" in the financial system

IPOs are not just financing events; they are disclosure-and-price-discovery institutions. The registration process publicly codifies a company's risks and prospects; underwriters' bookbuilding aggregates investor information; first-day pricing reflects the interplay of incentives (e.g., Rock's winner's-curse logic) and market conditions; VCs and insiders obtain partial liquidity; and exchanges provide public trading venues under listing and governance standards. Over the long run, outcomes vary: some vintages flourish; others lag benchmarks—reminding issuers and investors to treat IPOs as beginnings, not finishes.

Key Takeaway

IPOs serve multiple functions in the financial system: they provide capital access, price discovery, liquidity for early investors, and establish governance structures. Understanding these various roles helps both companies and investors make informed decisions about participating in the IPO market.

Important Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. The author is not a registered investment advisor, certified financial planner, or certified public accountant. Always consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal.

The information provided here is based on the author's opinions and experience. Your financial situation is unique, and you should consider your own circumstances before making any financial decisions.

Share This Article

Sources & References

[1]
SEC, Office of Investor Education & Advocacy Investor Bulletin: Investing in an IPO. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
[2]
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. Journal of Finance.
[3]
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance.
[4]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2020). Report to Congress: Concept Release on Harmonization of Securities Offering Exemptions. SEC Report to Congress.
[5]
Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991). Venture Capitalist Certification in IPOs. Journal of Finance.
[6]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Form S-1 Registration Statement. SEC Filing Requirements.
[7]
Benveniste, L. M., & Spindt, P. A. (1989). How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues. Journal of Financial Economics.
[8]
Hanley, K. W. (1993). The Underpricing of IPOs and the Partial Adjustment Phenomenon. Journal of Financial Economics.
[9]
Rock, K. (1986). Why New Issues Are Underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics.
[10]
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. Journal of Finance.
[11]
Ritter, J. R. (2025). Initial Public Offerings: Underpricing. University of Florida IPO Database.
[12]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Direct Listings. SEC Investor Bulletin.
[13]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Overview of Pathways to Going Public. SEC Comparison Chart.
[14]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Bulletin: Investing in an IPO. SEC Office of Investor Education.
[15]
Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991). Venture Capitalist Certification in IPOs. Journal of Finance.
[16]
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance.
[17]
NYSE and Nasdaq Listing Standards and Fees. Exchange Requirements.
[18]
Nasdaq (2025). Initial Listing Guide. Nasdaq Listing Center.
[19]
Benveniste, L. M., & Spindt, P. A. (1989). How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues. Journal of Financial Economics.
[20]
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. Journal of Finance.
[21]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Bulletin: Reverse Mergers. SEC Office of Investor Education.
[22]
Appadu, N., Faelten, A., & Levis, M. (2014). Reverse Takeovers: The Other Side of the Poor Man's IPO. EFMA Annual Meeting Paper.
[23]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Shell Company Rulemaking. SEC Rulemaking.
[24]
Gahng, M., Ritter, J. R., & Zhang, D. (2023). SPACs. Review of Financial Studies.
[25]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2024). Final Rules; Guidance: Special Purpose Acquisition Companies. SEC Final Rules.
[26]
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance.
[27]
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Bulletin: Reverse Mergers. SEC Office of Investor Education.
[28]
Gahng, M., Ritter, J. R., & Zhang, D. (2023). SPACs. Review of Financial Studies.
[29]
Nasdaq and NYSE Initial Listing Standards. Exchange Listing Requirements.
[30]
McMillan LLP (2025). Nasdaq Listing Standards Update. Regulatory Update.
[31]
Rock, K. (1986). Why New Issues Are Underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics.

Click on any cited text in the article to jump to its source.